05.17.08 - 11:36pm
I just brought a new project into the world of autotest. I’m not using the Leopard FSEvents “fix” because it’s not necessary (note the sleep and add_exception calls below). I am using the fun and helpful sound plugin, but not the playlist version of that plugin. Here’s my .autotest file.
Category: testing, ruby, ruby on rails, Mac, tools | Tags: | 1 Comment »
05.16.08 - 04:42pm
I’ve seen a few Rake tasks for Rcov that work OK, but which fail in an interesting way (if you care about coverage): they give your coverage metrics an unexpected boost if you have 0% coverage in one or more source files.
Huh? Exactly. If you have 500 source files, and your test suite only requires […]
Category: coverage, testing, ruby, ruby on rails, tools, Uncategorized | Tags: | Be the First to Comment »
04.14.08 - 10:11am
Git is getting a lot of press in the open source world lately, but hasn’t got much traction in the closed source corporate development world. There’s a reason for this, and it’s more than conservatism on the part of the corporate developers. Git (or any DVCS, really) embodies a development culture that isn’t very enterprise-y.
Category: git, management, tools, process | Tags: | 2 Comments »
07.27.07 - 08:58pm
Last year I was doing mobile development and there was interesting Linux-as-smartphone-OS stuff going on. Now I’m doing Ruby on Rails development and there’s interesting server grid stuff going on. Here’s what I’m looking forward to finding out more about (all of these are things I’ve been watching or directly researching already):
Category: zfs, gfs, vmware, raid, oracle, nfs, xen, ruby, servers, tools, databases, postgresql, ruby on rails, Linux | Tags: | 1 Comment »
07.11.07 - 01:26pm
Coverage tests in Ruby (with rcov) are less strict than in Java (with EMMA), so watch out - 100% coverage is easy to attain but not as meaningful.
Category: testing, coverage, java, ruby, tools | Tags: | 3 Comments »