Comments for Pervasive Code

Comment on Silencing pointless reverse DNS warnings from OpenSSH by Josh Horton

Josh Horton — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 06:07:53 +0000

Thank you for the quick answer to this annoying error msg.

Comment on Leopard Upgrade Report: Mo’ Features, Mo’ Problems by Jay Caines-Gooby

Jay Caines-Gooby — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:51:09 +0000

I had the same problem. The quickest fix for me was to use the gnu screen from fink. This solved all my lost environment issues (make sure that /sw/bin is earlier in your PATH than /usr/bin or you’ll still be using the Leopard-supplied screen

Comment on Why mod_rails is great for light-duty Rails apps by Markov Blog » Blog Archive » Trying out mod_rails

Markov Blog » Blog Archive » Trying out mod_rails — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:01:58 +0000

[…] swap area hard, so it seems that it takes a little more memory than a pair of mongrels. Although I already read about that. I suppose it should be fine with 512MB with a light load. And RailsMaxPoolSize is quite […]

Comment on Bad, Bad Code by What really is BAD code ? Levels of Bad-ness « Computing Life

What really is BAD code ? Levels of Bad-ness « Computing Life — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 06:02:01 +0000

[…] Heres a sample of code at this level […]

Comment on Why mod_rails is great for light-duty Rails apps by Dreamhost and mod_rails for your tiny Rails application | alex brie . net

Dreamhost and mod_rails for your tiny Rails application | alex brie . net — Thu, 29 May 2008 03:48:48 +0000

[…] dedicated or VPS, mongrel is still the right choice being slightly faster and using less RAM (see this for reference). What’s the best part about mod_rails ? Dreamhost included it on their […]

Comment on Ruby First Impressions: Backup Scripting by James

James — Mon, 26 May 2008 23:40:02 +0000

How goes the backup project? Were you able to build the system that you were after? I’m hoping to pick up some scraps!

Comment on Why mod_rails is great for light-duty Rails apps by » Ditching Mongrel for mod_rails » My geek blog - Brian McQuay

» Ditching Mongrel for mod_rails » My geek blog - Brian McQuay — Sun, 25 May 2008 08:27:11 +0000

[…] in the past but everything sent me back to Mongrel. Until today of course when I came across Jamie Flournoy’s blog about […]

Comment on Why mod_rails is great for light-duty Rails apps by links for 2008-05-25 « Mike Does Tech

links for 2008-05-25 « Mike Does Tech — Sun, 25 May 2008 00:33:02 +0000

[…] Why mod_rails is great for light-duty Rails apps at Pervasive Code (tags: mod_rails rubyonrails deployment apache) […]

Comment on Why mod_rails is great for light-duty Rails apps by Tom Copeland

Tom Copeland — Fri, 23 May 2008 22:43:13 +0000

For the the big win is not having to manage the mongrel cluster port range, not having to worry about a couple slow file uploads/downloads locking up all the mongrels, not having to worry about slow S3 or Salesforce calls locking up all the mongrels, etc., etc. Count me onboard the mod_rails bandwagon… it’s making my cluster management skills obsolete and I still love it :-)

Comment on Why mod_rails is great for light-duty Rails apps by 28 mod_rails / Passenger Resources To Help You Deploy Rails Applications Faster

28 mod_rails / Passenger Resources To Help You Deploy Rails Applications Faster — Fri, 23 May 2008 20:36:05 +0000

[…] & Benchmarks Why mod_rails is great for light-duty Rails apps - A blog post that takes a deep look into the motivation behind Passenger and where it fits in […]